I watched SGA 2.16 last night
Jan. 6th, 2006 08:29 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I just wanted to say that there was such a slashy editing in that look where not-John tells Teyla that John cares for her, and we cut to the heartbroken expression on Rodney's face and that if you're not interpreting it in the slashy way, I don't see how else you'd make sense of it.
It was sort of... so... utterly slashy. Like the editors were having an inside joke with the slashers.
I haven't seen such obvious "is this *meant* to be slash-driven?" editing since the pilot episode of Sports Night. You know the moment I mean, where Casey kisses Dana's cheek, and we cut to a stricken expression on Dan's face.
Also, I totally saw a lot of that plot coming. I don't know if that means I'm getting into the logic and characterisation (the groove) of SGA well enough to understand and predict their storytelling techniques, or if it means that the plot was really dodgy.
It was sort of... so... utterly slashy. Like the editors were having an inside joke with the slashers.
I haven't seen such obvious "is this *meant* to be slash-driven?" editing since the pilot episode of Sports Night. You know the moment I mean, where Casey kisses Dana's cheek, and we cut to a stricken expression on Dan's face.
Also, I totally saw a lot of that plot coming. I don't know if that means I'm getting into the logic and characterisation (the groove) of SGA well enough to understand and predict their storytelling techniques, or if it means that the plot was really dodgy.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-06 09:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-06 10:03 am (UTC)But for a moment, I was all "oh, oh, this exposition is so clunky, she must be doing it for *this reason*" and she was, which was infinitely better than...
...well...
The Storm/The Eye episodes where the exposition is so clunky it starts being *funny* (especially the *fifth* time the same plot point gets explained in a double episode).
no subject
Date: 2006-01-06 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-06 10:21 pm (UTC)Bwah! Yes! Exactly!
And I feel so anally-retentive to have to point out that it's actually the last *ten* years. Otherwise Dan would have been crushing on Casey before Sam died, which... okay, would be fun in an AU, but it's not actually canon.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-06 10:41 pm (UTC)OH! Wait! It's Queer as Folk where Vince has been in love with Stuart for fifteen years. OK. That must have muddled me up. Hee. Thankyou for pointing it out, though, cause I get annoyingly pedantic about this things too, and it's quite a relief to know it's not just me and that people will correct me if I'm going entirely insane. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-06 10:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-11 09:02 pm (UTC)I don't get the reference. Explain?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-17 04:14 pm (UTC)Referencing Gilbert Ryle (http://brighid.lyricalmagic.com/ryle.html) by Brighid.
(Also, I was looking for it and found Double Occupancy (http://isis.arithmancy.net/double.htm), which is only similar in that it has body sharing, but is fun. McKay/Sheppard, R?, has interesting Kavanagh, which is not 2D although in places it oozes towards disparaging, it's nice not to see blind scapegoating.)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-01 12:21 am (UTC)Very late, sorry. Fic-that-turned-out-to-indeed-be-RGR was posted mid (or possibly early) into S1, and was kinda similar to this ep.
I've read the story before but I can't quite remember it (I recognise the disneyland reference and some of the lines). that sounds like a good excuse to read it again.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-01 12:24 am (UTC)*reads over that sentence*
*snerks*
Wow, Annie. Way to take a good, moving fic and remember it for the cheesiest plot aspects. (This is also why reading through sgastoryfinders is so amusing. Everyone remembers stories like that.)