![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
So, you have recourse against being fired for homosexual conduct (attending pride rallies is the example given), as long as you can prove that you're straight? Is it okay to sleep with women (or men, if you're a guy), as long as you still identify yourself as a heterosexual?
I mean, isn't it the conduct of sleeping with the same gender that gives you the status of a homosexual? How can you divide one from the other?
As I read it, it's basically saying that if you're straight, and you're fired for being gay, it's descrimination. If you actually are gay, then that's fine.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-18 02:24 pm (UTC)*blinks*
I think, on a really deep scary level, it's one of those love the sinner hate the sin things, and they're trying to legislate and write policy based on that. Which goes against everything this country should be standing for.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-18 03:31 pm (UTC)Yeah, except it's the other way around. Hate the sinner, tolerate the sin.
It's just so very homophobic. You only have protection against homophobia if you're not homosexual. It's like... giving a free pass to firing people because they're gay, and making sure you have a back-up plan in place to protect any straight people who might get targetted. *shakes head*
Not good.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-18 08:42 pm (UTC)I'd love it if everyone else, ala In and Out just stood up and said, "I'm gay" in support. *sighs* Bet it'd never happen, though. :(
~Jess
no subject
Date: 2004-03-18 09:29 pm (UTC)*nods* That's exactly it.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-19 02:08 am (UTC)Most days, actually.
no subject
Date: 2004-03-19 04:04 pm (UTC)